Therefore, understanding the ecological fitness of the potential yeast biocontrol agents and developing strategies to enhance their stress tolerance are essential to their efficacy and commercial application.Brian B. Amblyseius swirskii is a predatory mite and one of the most successful commercial natural enemies in covered crops.Additionally, during the production process, biocontrol agents encounter various severe abiotic stresses that also impact their viability. © 2002 Plant Management Network.The CABI BioProtection Portal is a free, web based tool that enables users to discover information about registered biocontrol and biopesticide products around the world. Approaches to biocontrol are distinguished by how a biocontrol agent is. From this point forward, the term 'biocontrol' will refer to the classical biocontrol approach to managing invasive plants. Biocontrol methods have since been developed to manage a variety of insect, mite, pathogen, and plant pests, and occasionally vertebrate pest species.
However, the interrelationships of many environmental variables can result in multiple interactions among organisms and their environment, several of which might contribute to effective biological control. In the narrowest sense, biocontrol involves suppressing pest organisms with other organisms. Plant pathogens are just one class of targets of biological control, which also is designed to limit other pests such as insects, parasitic nematodes, and weeds. Plant Health Progress doi:10.1094/PHP-2002-0510-01-RV.Biological control of plant pests and pathogens continues to inspire research and development in many fields. Biological control of plant pathogens: Research, commercialization, and application in the USA. Fravel, Vegetable Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705You searched for: Journal BioControl Remove constraint Journal: BioControl Source 2008 v.53 no.6 Remove constraint Source: 2008 v.53 no.6 Start Over Toggle facetsCorresponding author: Brian B.
Begonias were grown in the greenhouse and inoculated with Botrytis cinerea under conditions optimal for the development of disease. Example bioassay for biological control of a plant pathogen. We conclude by describing future prospects for using biological control to limit the damage of plant pathogens in both conventional and organic agriculture. Here, we use the term biological control in the broader sense as we describe the current status of research, commercial development, and application of biocontrol strategies targeted at plant pathogens.
Screening methods for parasitism include burying and retrieving propagules of the pathogen to isolate parasites. However, this method does not identify biocontrol agents with other modes of action such as parasitism, induced plant resistance, or some forms of competition. Many useful bacterial biocontrol agents have been found by observing zones of inhibition in Petri plates (Fig. The success of all subsequent stages depends on the ability of a screening procedure to identify an appropriate candidate. Screening is a critical step in the development of biocontrol agents. Some of the microbial taxa that have been successfully commercialized and are currently marketed as EPA-registered biopesticides in the United States include bacteria belonging to the genera Agrobacterium, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Streptomyces and fungi belonging to the genera Ampelomyces, Candida, Coniothyrium, and Trichoderma (20).
Different bacterial isolates are tested for their ability to inhibit the growth of Pythium spp. Example in vitro inhibition assay. Primary screens for new biocontrol microbes are still undertaken (13), and it seems likely that continued prospecting will be required to diversify the potential applications of biocontrol as well as replace more widely used biocontrol products should resistance develop.Fig.
Indeed, a variety of pathogenic and non-pathogenic microorganisms can induce plant defenses and may be useful as biocontrol agents (22). Research into the mechanism by which plants resist bacterial pathogens (10) led to the discovery of harpin, a protein that is now being used to activate crop defenses prior to pathogen attack. That compound provided the chemical model for development of fludioxonil, a broad-spectrum fungicide used as seed treatment, foliar spray, or soil drench (14). One well-known example is pyrrolnitrin, a natural product produced by some Pseudomonas spp. Research on the mechanisms of biocontrol employed by effective bacterial strains has revealed a variety of natural products that can be exploited for the development of chemical control measures. Zones of growth inhibition can be detected around strains placed at two of the four positions on the plate (click image for larger view ).In addition, other areas of research in the field of plant pathology have opened up new opportunities for disease control.
Fundamental work remains to be done on characterizing the different mechanisms by which organic amendments reduce plant disease (9). Still, much remains to be learned about the microbial ecology of both plant pathogens and their microbial antagonists in different agricultural systems (12,23). Advanced molecular techniques are now being used to characterize the diversity, abundance, and activities of microbes that live in and around plants, including those that significantly impact plant health (15,17). Such discoveries point to the substantial potential of diverse programs in basic research to lead to improvements in various biological control strategies.A variety of research questions remain to be fully answered about the nature of biological control and the means to most effectively manage it under production conditions.
Such concerns have led to increased restrictions on a variety of chemical pesticides, including some of those used to suppress plant diseases. The FQPA reconciles previous discrepancies between pesticide regulation under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Federal Food Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). Growing concerns about environmental health and safety have led to substantial regulatory changes in the past several years, including the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (Appendix 1). Composite picture of several products currently being sold as biopesticides for the control of plant diseases (click image for larger view ).Interest in biological control research continues reflecting the desire of multiple constituencies to develop sustainable methods for controlling plant disease. Commercial development*Fig.
Still, the path to developing and applying effective biocontrol methods is a long one, fraught with a variety of difficulties (16). Such market realities promote the development of biocontrol products. In addition, the majority of growers continue to express interest in biologically-based pest management strategies of all types as central components of an IPM approach. The CREES Biological Control Working Group (Appendix 1), which brings together representatives of state and federal agencies and the private sector, have published a white paper defining a new paradigm for biocontrol and outlining action steps to foster further development of the industry (4).
Because the cost of registering a product with the EPA as a biopesticide can be between $200,000 and $500,000, a minimum capitalization close to 1 million dollars is required for establishing a start-up company. In addition, larger, billion-dollar companies with more diverse product lines that include a variety of agricultural chemicals and biotechnologies (e.g., Gufstafson LLC, Monsanto, Syngenta) have played a significant role in the development and marketing of products for the control of plant pathogens. Others are publicly traded and have substantial capitalization values of between 10 and 100 million dollars (e.g., Eden Bioscience). Many of these companies are small, privately owned firms with a limited product-line (e.g., Galltrol produced by AgBiochem). A growing number of companies are also developing new products that are in the process of being registered.
0 kommentar(er)
